In its report on the deadly school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, Justice Department officials strongly criticized the local police and issued blunt, unambiguous guidance for the future: Officers must rapidly confront a gunman, even if it costs them their lives.
The rebuke reflected the department’s frustration with the failure of police officials in the deadly 2022 shooting to observe protocols developed over the past two decades, and intended to address the threat of gunmen armed with battlefield-grade guns that can quickly kill dozens of people.
Most other types of police training emphasize careful, coordinated action to minimize the loss of life. But active-shooter protocols ask officers to abandon their civilian mind-set and transform, in an instant, into a kind of warrior posture.
Full story: After Uvalde School Shooting, Challenges Endure Despite Clear Police Protocols – The New York Times
The Uvalde tragedy revealed serious flaws in the way police handle active shootings and prepare for them. What potential policy reforms could address the inadequacies found in the Uvalde response?, and how do they challenge current criminal justice rules and processes relating to active shooter situations? Under tremendous pressure, focus on making quick decisions, communicating clearly, and acting promptly. Teach leadership how to assign tasks efficiently and provide officers advice in real time. Officers should be put through increasingly difficult simulated high-stress circumstances in order to develop emotional resilience and enhance their ability to make decisions under duress. Provide police with precise frameworks for evaluating active shooter scenarios and setting action priorities that strike a balance between the safety of officers and the protection of civilians, taking legal and ethical factors into account.